Monday, August 27, 2007

The thin line between biology and technology

Garlinggauge

Although technology is by definition considered artificial and biology natural, technology has been intimately linked to the possibility of creating ‘living’ things. What is it then about technology that relates it to the creation of life?

Cyborgs, clones and prosthetic devices seem to suggest that the human body is no more than an advanced ‘natural’ machine. Therefore, in the same way that human beings evolved from primates, technology has also evolved into artificial intelligence. For this reason, the line that distinguishes technology from biology has disappeared; giving rise to what is referred to as biotechnology.

This is seen in the common use of prosthetic devices, such as contact lenses, hearing aids and prosthetic limbs. The use of prosthetic devices is not merely an extension of the human body with a technological device, but rather the creation of a new physiological entity altogether.

This new physiological entity constructed from the merger of a prosthetic device and a biological organ forms an information circuit of energy exchange, which allows it to function as a single unit. This fusion of technology and biology implies that to some degree humans have become cyborgs.

According to cyberneticist Kevin Warwick, technology has the potential to impact on the relationship between human evolution and our physical transformation process. For this reason, Warwick argues, “it is no longer of advantage to either remain ‘human’ or evovle”. This implies that biological organs run the risk of being replaced by technological devices that perform the same functions. Therefore, Lister et al write, “biological entities have become components for the technological reconstruction of the bodies”.

Personally, I accept the use of prosthetic devices as necessary in medical situations. However, when you consider movies that depict supersoldiers, such as 'Universal Soldier' (1992) and 'Terminator' (1984), one has to wonder how long will these features remain solely in the medical field, before the military adopts them (if it hasn't already). We have to remember that most of our current technology (i.e. the internet) were primarily designed for and used in the military.

As mentioned in an earlier blogpost, some of these ‘cyberpunk’ science fictional movies appear farfetched, yet actually point to current developments in science technology.

Reference:
Lister, M (ed). 2003. New Media: A critical Introduction. Routledge.

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

Well written.

You have an interesting blog and I wanted to tell you that I'm adding you to my blogroll.

Thanks also for the link.

C. Garling
http://garlinggauge.com